To get the idea (All the movies of Spiderman are created with Cinema 4D + VRAY) Rather, SONY Pictures works with Cinema 4D.

I recently saw a render of a car and it looks real. With Blender using the same processor, 16GB of RAM reaching 8 million vertices doesn't respond and even closes giving an error (blender.exe stopped working).Ĭinema 4D is professional software and Blender is more for personal use, but the work of many people is incredible. For now the record I have achieved with an i5 3570 and 8GB of RAM has been 22 million vertices in real time.

I also in C4D I simulate a cassette tape totally realistic with the simulation of physics, although the video is low quality because the CPU took several hours per frame and is a video of 30 minutes.Īnother detail is with Cinema 4D you can give firewood to your processor and RAM and will not be affected the performance. With Blender for more than I have tried to configure the physics there is no way to work, domino pieces seem like if have life. I have on my youtube channel 3 simulation videos with totally realistic falling of dominoes created with Cinema 4D. With Cinema 4D you can simulate any type of physics in a realistic way, depending on what you want to do it may take a while to calculate the physics but the result is incredible, with blender the calculation of physics also takes a while but then when doing the render is as if all the time you change the speed of the video, that is unrealistic and complete FAIL!. One of the things I really like about Cinema 4D and that in Blender is a complete 's-' is the simulation of physics.

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από sshadowthekid:thing is what can cinema 4d do that blender can't?

Blender vs cinema 4d reddit